I'm pretty sure that the last thing they want is a bunch of port scanning
being done on the basis of your assumption. What is your criteria for a
"general overview" and the basis for your conclusion?
Just wondering...
Ken
Ken Pfeil
Director, Information Security
Miradiant Global Network, Inc
kpfeil_at_nospam.miradiant.com
http://www.miradiant.com
15 Broad Street
New York, NY 10005
PGP Lookup:
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3011C88A
"Of course my password is the same as my pet's name.
My dog's name was Q47pY!3$H9x, but I change it every 90 days."
-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Tayler [mailto:erik_at_DIGITALOFFENSE.NET]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 11:36 AM
To: PEN-TEST_at_SECURITYFOCUS.COM
Subject: Re: [PEN-TEST] WebEx security?
A general overview would suffice. Anyone with non-intrusive probing
capabilities would be able to tell right off the bat.
And no, I didn't break into their site, then draw up the conclusion they
are insecure.
Erik Tayler
http://www.digitaloffense.net
http://www.14x.net
Alfred Huger wrote:
>
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Erik Tayler wrote:
>
> > Judging by the state of security of their network, I wouldn't go with
> > them. Security is the last thing they should be talking about on their
> > site. Just my 2 cents.
>
> How exactly did you come to this conclusion?
Received on Nov 01 2000
Intro
