Home page logo
/

metasploit logo Metasploit mailing list archives

Re: meterpreter
From: Jonathan Cran <jcran () 0x0e org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:49:50 -0500

On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Nicolas Krassas <krasn () ans gr> wrote:
 Thanks for your reply I'm aware of the first 2 options none of them though is what I'm looking for. The service , 
metsvc  is dependent on the framework itself, also implies that I've the right to install a service,  and that is 
exactly what I don't :)

fyi, metsvc can run standalone (no need for a service install).

 i think i see what you're going for though. You're interested in
getting SYSTEM on the box via meterpreter completely standalone - no
incoming / outgoing control to the handler - or implementing a "local"
handler - you would need to implement something to drive the
meterpreter dll's - currently this is implemented in ruby via the
framework - i'm not aware of any other implementation.

As for the last one, as I mention the host is almost completely firewalled on outgoing connections.

In the case of the ncat.exe technique, you use the framework to
connect _in_ to the host, if that helps. you can also specify an
arbitrary port when you set up the backdoor. Port forwarding is your
friend?

Not sure this is extremely helpful, but good luck.

jcran
_______________________________________________
https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]