Home page logo
/

metasploit logo Metasploit mailing list archives

Re: PassiveX is dead?
From: Richard Miles <richard.k.miles () googlemail com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 14:53:01 -0500

Very interesting. I'm excited to see the second stage using the same
resources (such as proxy address, port and authentication).

Thanks and keep the good work.

On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 2:07 PM, HD Moore <hdm () metasploit com> wrote:
On 6/26/2011 1:43 PM, Richard Miles wrote:
Hi HD Moore,

I see. But reverse_https is not able to reuse the same connection from
IE, right? Sor for example, if the IE browser uses a proxy and the
proxy require authentication (integrated on the DC) it will fail,
right?

The first stage of reverse_https uses the same information that IE does
to make the connection (through the use of WinInet). The second stage
does not and this is where work needs to be done.

Do you mean just proxy configuration (host and port), right? I mean,
if they required NTLM authentication the first stage will fail, right?

The first stage uses WinInet with the PRECONFIG option, which also
includes authentication.

-HD

_______________________________________________
https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault