Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: IP provider performance measurement BOF
From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis () ans net>
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 1995 16:43:25 -0500


In message <199503070244.VAA19836 () merit edu>, "Roger Fajman" writes:
I think that this is a great idea, however, I want to stress
that the appropriate forum for the discussion of _results_
as opposed to the development of the tools to gather them
is NOT the IETF, but rather NANOG or IESG.

Any attempt by a WG at IETF to benchmark issues related
to operations, or to attempt to compare operational aspects
of ISPs, is something that I will not find particularly friendly.

OTOH, I *would* like to see NANOG and IESG be the place
to test whatever the WG comes up with and to discuss and
share results.

       Sean.

Some of us customers would like to see such results too.
They don't have to come from an IETF WG, but it would be
very helpful for them to come from some unbiased source.
Perhaps Scott Bradner has some spare time.  :-)

Roger Fajman                                   Telephone:  +1 301 402 4265
National Institutes of Health                  BITNET:     RAF () NIHCU
Bethesda, Maryland, USA                        Internet:   RAF () CU NIH GOV


IMO the IETF Operations Area has not been unfair or hostile toward
providers.  I'm not sure what the objections are.

Curtis


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]