mailing list archives
Re: PI vs PA Address Space
From: Michael Dillon <michael () junction net>
Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 15:28:37 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 18 May 1995, Karl Denninger, MCSNet wrote:
nothing longer than /18 or /19 (it's /18 now, but it's
not entirely inflexible, and dialogues continue) will
have global scope.
As an aside, is anyone else besides Sprint behind this /18
model? I know that Sean is a big proponent but I have heard
no other public comment on this. (well there was one, which
indicated that the community had reached consenses on this point,
which is why I ask.)
These people are NUTS.
BTW, in case it matters, one of our customers has ALREADY been bit by this
when they attempted to leave MCSNet and attach to Sprint with addresses
delegated from a netblock which Sprint assigned to us. They were first
given incorrect information by Sprint's NOC personnell and then forced to
renumber not only their internal hosts, but their CUSTOMERS machines.
This appears to be Sprint's policy. It happened to us when we left INSINC
(Sprint Canada) for another provider and they refused to let us take a
CIDR block with us. Fortunately, we had not yet allocated any of those
addresses to customers.
My recommendation: If your addresses do not come directly from a NIC, then
get the allocation IN WRITING and SIGNED! If your provider will not sign
for it, then apply directly to the NIC.
Michael Dillon Voice: +1-604-549-1036
Network Operations Fax: +1-604-542-4130
Okanagan Internet Junction Internet: michael () junction net
http://www.junction.net - The Okanagan's 1st full-service Internet provider
Re: PI vs PA Address Space Hank Nussbacher (May 22)