nanog: by thread

• RSS Feed
•  About List
•  All Lists

Previous period

Next period

210 messages starting Oct 02 95 and ending Oct 31 95
Date index | Thread index | Author index

• Re: number of unaggregated class C's in swamp? Alan Hannan (Oct 02)
  • Re: number of unaggregated class C's in swamp? Yakov Rekhter (Oct 02)
• Re: Peering in the LA region?!? Marcos Della (Oct 02)
• Re: geeting NANOG listed in Encyclopedia of Associations Curtis Villamizar (Oct 02)
• Re: Comments on Routing and Allocation Policy Wanted Patrick Horgan (Oct 02)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Comments on Routing and Allocation Policy Wanted Sanjay Dani (Oct 02)
    • Re: Comments on Routing and Allocation Policy Wanted Dave Siegel (Oct 02)
  • Re: Comments on Routing and Allocation Policy Wanted Patrick Horgan (Oct 02)
• MCI and SprintLink are partitioned (fwd) Gordon Cook (Oct 04)
  • Re: MCI and SprintLink are partitioned (fwd) Hans-Werner Braun (Oct 04)
    • Re: MCI and SprintLink are partitioned (fwd) bmanning (Oct 04)
      • Re: MCI and SprintLink are partitioned (fwd) Hans-Werner Braun (Oct 04)
      • Re: MCI and SprintLink are partitioned (fwd) bmanning (Oct 04)
      • Re: MCI and SprintLink are partitioned (fwd) Hans-Werner Braun (Oct 04)
      • Re: MCI and SprintLink are partitioned (fwd) Andrew Partan (Oct 04)
      • Re: MCI and SprintLink are partitioned (fwd) Bilal Chinoy (Oct 04)
      • Re: MCI and SprintLink are partitioned (fwd) bmanning (Oct 04)
      • Re: MCI and SprintLink are partitioned (fwd) Bilal Chinoy (Oct 04)
      • Posting NAP Stats William B. Norton (Oct 05)
    • Re: MCI and SprintLink are partitioned (fwd) Elise Gerich (Oct 04)
    • Re: MCI and SprintLink are partitioned (fwd) Curtis Villamizar (Oct 04)
    • Re: MCI and SprintLink are partitioned (fwd) Andrew Partan (Oct 04)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: MCI and SprintLink are partitioned (fwd) Enke Chen (Oct 04)
    • Re: MCI and SprintLink are partitioned (fwd) Chris Garner (Oct 04)
      • Re: MCI and SprintLink are partitioned (fwd) Enke Chen (Oct 04)
  • Re: MCI and SprintLink are partitioned (fwd) Curtis Villamizar (Oct 04)
  • Re: MCI and SprintLink are partitioned (fwd) Craig A. Haney (Oct 04)
  • Re: MCI and SprintLink are partitioned (fwd) Sean Doran (Oct 04)
  • Re: MCI and SprintLink are partitioned (fwd) Hank Nussbacher (Oct 05)
• Welcome to nanog Majordomo (Oct 05)
• Program: 6th Maryland Workshop on Very High Speed Networks Account of Maryland Center for Telecommunications Research (Oct 06)
• Funding for NAPs... Matt Zimmerman (Oct 07)
  • Re: Funding for NAPs... Dave Siegel (Oct 07)
    • BGP4 peering wiht Sprint, and MCI Nathan Stratton (Oct 14)
      • Re: BGP4 peering wiht Sprint, and MCI Curtis Villamizar (Oct 16)
  • Re: Funding for NAPs... bmanning (Oct 07)
    • Re: Funding for NAPs... Paul Love (Oct 07)
      • Re: Funding for NAPs... Jon Zeeff (Oct 07)
      • Re: Funding for NAPs... D. Brian Kimmel (Oct 07)
      • Re: Funding for NAPs... Bill Manning (Oct 09)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Funding for NAPs... John G. Scudder (Oct 08)
    • Re: Funding for NAPs... Gordon Cook (Oct 08)
      • Re: Funding for NAPs... Nathan Stratton (Oct 08)
      • Re: Funding for NAPs... Gordon Cook (Oct 08)
      • Re: Funding for NAPs... joliveto (Oct 08)
  • Re: Funding for NAPs... Dave Sincoskie (Oct 09)
    • Re: Funding for NAPs... Nathan Stratton (Oct 09)
    • Re: Funding for NAPs... Avi Freedman (Oct 09)
• filtering long prefixes Daniel Karrenberg (Oct 08)
• Sprint violations (setting space aside for slow-start allocations) Daniel Karrenberg (Oct 08)
• [no subject] Lucia Cerbai (Oct 10)
• DNS delegation for non-octet boundaries Jeremy Porter (Oct 12)
  • Re: DNS delegation for non-octet boundaries Toshiya Asaba (Oct 12)
    • Re: DNS delegation for non-octet boundaries Geert Jan de Groot (Oct 12)
  • Re: DNS delegation for non-octet boundaries Geert Jan de Groot (Oct 12)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: DNS delegation for non-octet boundaries William Allen Simpson (Oct 12)
  • Re: DNS delegation for non-octet boundaries Stan Barber (Oct 12)
• Re: BGP4 peering wiht Sprint, and MCI Robert Craig (Oct 14)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: BGP4 peering wiht Sprint, and MCI David Whipple (Oct 16)
• New and Improved Traceroute (semi-annual posting) Ehud Gavron (Oct 15)
• Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Tim Bass (Oct 15)
  • Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Theodore Ts'o (Oct 15)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP John Curran (Oct 15)
    • Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Tim Bass (Oct 15)
      • Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP bcurnow (Oct 15)
      • Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Justin Newton (Oct 17)
    • Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP George Herbert (Oct 15)
    • Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Philip J. Nesser (Oct 16)
  • Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Henry W. Miller (Oct 16)
    • Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Tim Bass (Oct 16)
      • Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP William B. Norton (Oct 16)
      • Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Forrest W. Christian (Oct 16)
  • Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP William Allen Simpson (Oct 16)
    • Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Forrest W. Christian (Oct 16)
    • Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Theodore Ts'o (Oct 16)
  • Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP William Allen Simpson (Oct 16)
    • Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Havard . Eidnes (Oct 16)
  • Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Vadim Antonov (Oct 16)
  • Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP William Allen Simpson (Oct 16)
  • Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Jeff . Ogden (Oct 16)
    • Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Barry Shein (Oct 16)
  • Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Bill Woodcock (Oct 16)
    • Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Michael Dillon (Oct 16)
      • Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP bmanning (Oct 16)
      • Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Catherine Anne Foulston (Oct 16)
  • Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP rboivie (Oct 16)
    • Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP William B. Norton (Oct 17)
• Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Robert Raisch, The Internet Company (Oct 16)
  • Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Paul Ferguson (Oct 16)
    • Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP bmanning (Oct 16)
    • Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Justin Newton (Oct 18)
  • Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Larry J. Plato (Oct 16)
  • Message not available
    • Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Jeffrey I. Schiller (Oct 16)
      • Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Paul Ferguson (Oct 16)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Jon Postel (Oct 17)
    • Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Tim Bass (Oct 17)
      • What is SPAM? - was Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion... Dave Siegel (Oct 17)
      • Re: What is SPAM? - was Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion... Larry J. Plato (Oct 17)
      • Re: What is SPAM? - was Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion... Barry Shein (Oct 17)
      • Re: What is SPAM? - was Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion... Jim De Arras (Oct 17)
      • Re: What is SPAM? - was Re: blah blah blah Elliot Alby (Oct 17)
      • Re: What is SPAM? - was Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion... Carl Payne (Oct 17)
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is SPAM? - was Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion... Len Rose (Oct 17)
      • Re: What is SPAM? - was Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion... Matthew James Marnell (Oct 17)
      • Re: What is SPAM? - was Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion... Justin Newton (Oct 18)
      • Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Paul A Vixie (Oct 17)
    • Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Hans-Werner Braun (Oct 17)
  • Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Jeff . Ogden (Oct 17)
  • Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Walter O. Haas (Oct 17)
• Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion for a new POST NSF Robert Raisch, The Internet Company (Oct 16)
  • Re: Legislative Relief Paul Ferguson (Oct 16)
    • Re: Legislative Relief Michael Dillon (Oct 16)
      • Re: Legislative Relief Paul Ferguson (Oct 16)
  • Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion for a new POST NSF bmanning (Oct 16)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion for a new POST NSF Robert Raisch, The Internet Company (Oct 16)
    • Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion for a new POST NSF bmanning (Oct 16)
• SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION Tim Bass (Oct 17)
  • Re: SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION bmanning (Oct 17)
    • Re: SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION Tim Bass (Oct 17)
      • Why not NANOG.... Mike O'Dell (Oct 17)
      • Re: Why not NANOG.... Jim Dixon (Oct 17)
  • Re: SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION Perry E. Metzger (Oct 17)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION Sean Doran (Oct 17)
    • Re: SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION Perry E. Metzger (Oct 17)
  • Re: SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION Cat Okita (Oct 17)
  • Re: SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION Patrick Horgan (Oct 17)
• Re: What is SPAM? - was Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion... Cat Okita (Oct 17)
  • Re: What is SPAM? - was Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion... Carl Payne (Oct 17)
• Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East William B. Norton (Oct 17)
  • Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East Curtis Villamizar (Oct 18)
    • Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East William B. Norton (Oct 20)
      • Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East Elise Gerich (Oct 20)
      • Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East Curtis Villamizar (Oct 21)
      • Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East Mike O'Dell (Oct 21)
      • Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East Mike Nasto (Oct 22)
      • Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East Tim Bass (Oct 22)
      • Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East Mike Nasto (Oct 22)
      • Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East Mike O'Dell (Oct 23)
      • Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East William B. Norton (Oct 23)
      • Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East Jeff Young (Oct 23)
      • Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East Tim Bass (Oct 23)
      • Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East Jonathan Heiliger (Oct 23)
      • Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East Nathan Stratton (Oct 22)
      • Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East William B. Norton (Oct 23)
      • Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East Andrew Partan (Oct 24)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East Steve Feldman (Oct 21)
  • Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East Brett D. Watson (Oct 23)
    • Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East Mike O'Dell (Oct 23)
    • Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East Curtis Villamizar (Oct 23)
      • Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East Jon Zeeff (Oct 23)
  • Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East Guy T Almes (Oct 23)
  • Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East Gerald Andrew Winters (Oct 23)
  • Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East Randy Bush (Oct 23)
  • Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East Guy T Almes (Oct 23)
  • Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East Steven J. Richardson (Oct 24)
    • Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East Tim Bass (Oct 24)
  • Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East Steven J. Richardson (Oct 24)
• WITHDRAWN: Motion for Post NSF AUP Tim Bass (Oct 18)
  • Re: WITHDRAWN: Motion for Post NSF AUP joliveto (Oct 21)
• unsubscribe.. Gopi K Garge (Oct 18)
• Asymmetric Routing joliveto (Oct 18)
  • Re: Asymmetric Routing Curtis Villamizar (Oct 18)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Asymmetric Routing Sean Doran (Oct 20)
  • Re: Asymmetric Routing Steven J. Richardson (Oct 23)
• New RA Tools Announcement labovit (Oct 18)
• CERT Advisory CA-95:12 - Sun 4.1.X Loadmodule Vulnerability CERT Advisory (Oct 18)
• lost RADB transactions on 10/14 Brian Renaud (Oct 18)
• CERT Advisory CA-95:13 - Syslog Vulnerability (with sendmail workaround) CERT Advisory (Oct 19)
• subscribe sharono (Oct 20)
• unscribe Frank C. Liu (Oct 20)
• MAE-East Ran Atkinson (Oct 22)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: MAE-East Scott Bradner (Oct 22)
  • Re: MAE-East Steve Feldman (Oct 22)
  • Re: MAE-East Sean Doran (Oct 22)
  • Re: MAE-East Sean Doran (Oct 22)
  • Re: MAE-East Sean Doran (Oct 22)
  • Re: MAE-East William Allen Simpson (Oct 23)
  • Re: MAE-East Sean Doran (Oct 23)
    • Re: MAE-East Hans-Werner Braun (Oct 23)
      • Re: MAE-East Nathan Stratton (Oct 23)
  • Re: MAE-East Brett D. Watson (Oct 23)
  • Re: MAE-East William Allen Simpson (Oct 24)
  • Re: MAE-East Vadim Antonov (Oct 24)
• Traffic Analysis ( was Re: Initial Route Server Stats) Tim Bass (Oct 23)
• mae-east dampening/flapping view Ed Kern (Oct 24)
• bcast LQM William Allen Simpson (Oct 24)
  • Re: bcast LQM Curtis Villamizar (Oct 24)
• IPPM: Measuring IP performance Kent W. England (Oct 24)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: IPPM: Measuring IP performance Guy T Almes (Oct 24)
• Black holes caused by aggregation bmanning (Oct 26)
• A bunch-of-morons Vadim Antonov (Oct 26)
• hum. Is the net-39 experiment expanded to net-38? Peter Lothberg (Oct 30)
  • Re: hum. Is the net-39 experiment expanded to net-38? bmanning (Oct 30)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: hum. Is the net-39 experiment expanded to net-38? Sean Doran (Oct 30)
• Request System Administrator# (Oct 30)
• New mailing list announcement Eric Kozowski (Oct 30)
  • Re: New mailing list announcement John Sechrest (Oct 30)
• Statistics and network analysis workshop Hans-Werner Braun (Oct 30)
• Peering problem with NSP Matt Harrop (Oct 30)
  • Re: Peering problem with NSP Nathan Stratton (Oct 30)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Peering problem with NSP Brian Dickson (Oct 31)
  • Re: Peering problem with NSP Matt Harrop (Oct 31)
  • Re: Peering problem with NSP William Allen Simpson (Oct 31)
  • Re: Peering problem with NSP Sean Doran (Oct 31)
    • Re: Peering problem with NSP Nathan Stratton (Oct 31)
    • Re: Peering problem with NSP Michael Dillon (Oct 31)
      • Re: Peering problem with NSP Tim Bass (Oct 31)
  • Re: Peering problem with NSP Brian Dickson (Oct 31)
  • Re: Peering problem with NSP Patrick Horgan (Oct 31)
    • Re: Peering problem with NSP Dave Siegel (Oct 31)

Previous period

Next period