Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible (fwd)
From: Dorian Kim <dorian () CIC Net>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1995 02:54:25 -0400 (EDT)

On Mon, 25 Sep 1995, Kai wrote:

In lieu of Computel knowing what the RADB is, I will handle the RADB entry
myself, if I don't decide to recycle the assignment altogether and start
from scratch, which is likely by now, after analyzing and evaluating the
situation a bit more. The Internic should strap on more asbestos now.

Just out of curiosity, why should Internic strap on more asbestos? 

I thought the following would have been warning enough:

 ***PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION PRIOR TO REQUESTING AN
IP NUMBER FROM THE INTERNIC:

Due to technical and implementation constraints on the Internet routing
system and the possibility of routing overload, certain policies may
need to be enforced by the major transit providers in order to reduce
the number of globally advertised routes.  These potential policies
may include setting limits on the size of CIDR prefixes added to the
routing tables, filtering of non-aggregated routes, etc.  Therefore,
addresses obtained directly from the InterNIC (non-provider-based,
also known as portable) are not guaranteed to be routable on the Internet.

-dorian
______________________________________________________________________________
 Dorian Kim               Email: dorian () cic net              2901 Hubbard Drive
 Network Engineer         Phone: (313)998-6976          Ann Arbor MI 48105
 CICNet Network Systems   Fax:   (313)998-6105     http://www.cic.net/~dorian



  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]