Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Non-profit IP Registry
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 1997 10:14:02 -0500

I'm quite aware of v6 implementation efforts; my point was that
the *scale* at which v6 is actually being implemented is
by no means, 'wide'. I suppose, however, that this is quite a
subjective statement from both perspectives.

I also hesitate to mention that there is a significant part of
the industry that still questions the immediate need for IPv6,
or perhaps has not been convinced that IPv6 actually fixes any
existing problems, but that is another can of worms altogether
and is better discussed in another venue.

- paul (not representative of cisco Systems, Inc.)


At 08:57 AM 1/4/97 -0500, Thomas Narten wrote:

May I please point out that this discussion has not mentioned the wide
scale implementation of IPv6 or some derrivative thereof.

What wide-scale implementation?

Chose your words carefully. What major vendor is _not_ "implementing"
IPv6? Be sure to check:

     http://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng/html/ipng-implementations.html
     http://www.research.microsoft.com/research/os/

Thomas      


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault