Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Non-profit IP Registry
From: "Daryn D. Fisher" <oz () thoughtport net>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 97 23:13:29 -0700

That is why:

" The Advisory Council is to act on behalf of the membership on all issues including, but not limited to:

¤ Registry goals
¤ Future funding
¤ Allocation policy guidelines
¤ Training
¤ Nominations for Advisory Council
¤ Database maintenance
¤ Registry procedures "

and:

"ARIN members will nominate candidates for the the Advisory Council."

This allows:

"The point has also been made that the management of the IP space should be put in the hands of those that depend on it - the users. Whether those users are ISPs, corporate entities, universities, etc., they should all play a role."


BTW, let's move this to the NAIPR list.


> There is a VERY serious flaw in this plan.
>
> The effective pricing drops with size. Yet the registry is
>technically required to be stingy in its IP allocations.
>
> Can you say "lawsuit"? I knew you could.
>
> Imagine if ivory sold large bars and small bars and the small
>bars were more cost effective. Then they would only sell you a small bar
>because you wouldn't need the large bar for a few months, thus causing
>you to pay more.
>
> Think about it.
>
> David Schwartz


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault