mailing list archives
Re: peering charges?
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () pluris com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 1997 23:54:18 -0800
Eric D. Madison wrote:
Since some of the larger vendors (Cisco mostly) has introduced accounting
features into their software settlements could start any time.
a) the accounting was there for years, so what
b) a 100-byte packet travelled from provider A to provider B. Should A pay
to B or vice versa?
So far nobody gave any useful answer to that question.
There are no settlements because traffic has little relevance to relative
worth of connectivity from one provider to another. The large ISPs are
generally interested in market share or peers, not in volume of mutual traffic.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Re: peering charges? Eric D. Madison (Jan 27)
- peering charges? Dave Curado (Jan 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: peering charges? Vadim Antonov (Jan 26)