mailing list archives
RE: peering charges?
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () pluris com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 02:17:06 -0800
Eric D. Madison <madison () acsi net> wrote:
Well, that's not exactly true, UUNet nor PSI show "profits", they show
Well, that's not exactly true.
Comm Week, Jan 20 1997, "Content Will Ultimately Win the Game for
ISPs" By Wayne Rash":
PSINet and Uunet last week, explaining that both companies
were dumping their retail consumers and concentrating on
business customers. As a result of this change in strategy, both
companies are announcing profits for the last quarter of 1996,
which is nearly unheard of in the Internet industry.
Revenue will cause Wall Street to favor your stock
even if you don't show real profits.
When money are going to upgrades you can always get profit by slowing
down sales. Like, by increasing prices or by dumping less profitable
That causes loss of market share, unless competitors are doing the
slow-down act as well. Which they do (except maybe MCI).
It's kind of pocker game with no limit...
The only company in the Internet
business that shows real profit is Cisco, and they are laughing all the way
to the bank. Of course vendors always have higher profit margin than
Well, most of Cisco's profit is coming from small boxes. _The_ laughing
company is Intel...
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- RE: peering charges?, (continued)