Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: [nsp] known networks for broadcast ping attacks
From: Jeremy Porter <jerry () fc net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 22:29:21 -0500


Maybe, I'm not completely understanding this, but
from my own testing, it seems to me that, when I do this without
regard to ip directed broadcast, I get one response back from the closest
interface, but perhaps they are using source routing or something
to cause this?

In message <19970730211625.11611 () texas net>, Edward Henigin writes:

      this does work as you'd expect (it prevents the cisco
from framing an IP broadcast packet into an ethernet broadcast
frame)  BUT unfortunately it can break Windows networking, as well
as BOOTP/DHCP, depending on how you're set up.

      but if you're not using one of the above (routed), then
by all means, 'no ip directed-broadcast' is an excellent way to go..

--
On Wed, Jul 30, 1997 at 02:52:14PM -0700, Craig A. Huegen said:
On Wed, 30 Jul 1997, Jeffrey S. Curtis wrote:

==>(And to answer the proverbial "how do I configure my router for that"
==>in advance, the answer is that, at least on my boxes, the not-allowing-
==>broadcast-pings-through-as-broadcasts-onto-the-target-media thing is on
==>by default.  Source address filtering, however, is not.)

For Ciscos, "no ip directed-broadcast" on your interfaces will
prevent remote devices from sending directed broadcasts.  No guarantees
about applications it might break, though.

/cah


---
Jeremy Porter, Freeside Communications, Inc.      jerry () fc net
PO BOX 80315 Austin, Tx 78708  |  1-800-968-8750  |  512-458-9810
http://www.fc.net


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault