Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Domain Name NASA.COM
From: Joe Shaw <jshaw () insync net>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 15:04:05 -0500 (CDT)

On Sat, 12 Jul 1997, William Allen Simpson wrote:

May I suggest that your customer sue, not the FTC or NASA, but the
Internic for violation of the contract.  You paid a fee, they are
required to follow their own procedures.  You should be able to get
quite a bit for actual and punitive damages.

And you would be doing all the rest of us a service, by setting a
precedent.  We really cannot have Internic becoming an extension of the
US government, or making arbitrary actions.  But enforcement of
contracts generally requires a court.

As far as I can see, you wouldn't even have to prove that NASA.COM was
"in a manner reasonably calculated to convey the impression".  That
would be up to NASA and/or FTC, should Internic get them to come to the
court (third party cross complaint, perhaps).

Although, for curiousities sake, what did this NASA stand for, and what
was their product?

Just FYI, The Hackers Defense Fund (http://www.hackerz.org) has a class
action lawsuit against The InterNIC for some reason or another.  I don't
know where they are at with it, but I saw Mike Roadancer this weekend, and
he said that it was going well...

Joe Shaw - jshaw () insync net
NetAdmin - Insync Internet Services
"Learn more, and you will never starve." - Paraphrase of Lee

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]