mailing list archives
Re: Another UUNET Explanation
From: Robert Bowman <rob () elite exodus net>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 1997 19:55:37 -0700 (PDT)
On the inverse, routers--if designed properly, can be 10 times better
because of lower overhead, cost effectiveness, etc. I don't think this
is going to be a debate that one will win in this forum. There are
many router only based backbones, such as ours, Digex, etc. Then there
are the many on the fr/router side.. just as "effective" one might
This is not exactly true. Frame Relay -- if designed properly, and with
good frame switches -- can be - IMHO - 10's of times better.
Frame Relay allows yout he ability to psuedo-directly connection various
pop's together, and gives that clean appearance of a 'no-hop' back bone.
Why route when you can switch?
On Tue, 1 Jul 1997, Robert Bowman wrote:
layer 2 vs. layer 3
tis like comparing a motorcyle to an automobile--both get you places
but in fairly different ways
I've noticed that several of the larger networks use frame-relay.
Why? Our experience with frame-relay with the local telco has had
What technical advantages does a frame-relay network have over an
IP routed network?
Re: Another UUNET Explanation Nathan Stratton (Jul 02)
Re: Another UUNET Explanation Ehud Gavron (Jul 02)
Re: Another UUNET Explanation Martin J. Hannigan (Jul 02)