mailing list archives
Re: Quote from Kashpureff / Re: question about per. hack
From: alan () mindvision com (Alan Hannan)
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 1997 22:38:30 -0500 (CDT)
It is my opinion that one has the power to self-moderate
Procmail enables one to delete the ramblings of noiseful
posters, while still preserving the amusement so many
serious networking folk gain from nanog.
The joy of this internet thing we've created is that we can
selectively enforce the ear-plugging.
I don't think moderation is appropriate.
From owner-nanog () merit edu Tue Jul 22 22:45:50 1997
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32)
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 1997 20:24:55 -0400
To: nanog () merit edu
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Subject: Re: Quote from Kashpureff / Re: question about per. hack
NANOG list maintainers:
Please consider this a formal request to moderate this list.
The signal/noise ratio is horrible as it is, and continuing
to ignore off-topic posts, such as the thread on DNS policy,
is compounding the issue.
I would appreciate a response on this issue asap.
Otherwise, I would fully expect to see an exodus of list
participants who can no longer tolerate noise.
At 07:40 PM 07/22/97 -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
Perhaps the thread has drifted off topic. But get off your goddamned
high horse and save us the snotty rejoinders, all right?
Re: Quote from Kashpureff / Re: question about per. hack Alan Hannan (Jul 23)
- RE: Quote from Kashpureff / Re: question about per. hack, (continued)