mailing list archives
Re: Terminating many T1's
From: Dave Bergum <bergum () MR Net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 12:30:49 -0500 (CDT)
On Wed, 23 Jul 1997 08:50:24 -0700 (PDT), Tom Eastgard <eastgard () nwnet net> said:
Tom> On Wed, 23 Jul 1997, David Mercer wrote:
>> On Tue, 22 Jul 1997, Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI wrote:
>> > On Tue, 22 Jul 1997, Stephen Balbach wrote:
>> > > 4. Chanellized DS3. Don't know anything about it - can MFS provide circuits
>> > > this way via a DS3 handoff? No CSU/DSU required? Any other costs/issues?
>> > Channelized DS3 stuff only seems to be useful for putting mulitple
>> > customers on a single physical circuit. You need to be able to break it
>> > out to the DS1 level for each customer. Perhaps MFS, PacBell, etc can do
>> > this? It's probably just a matter of them defining that "product".
>> > (I.E. Feed MFS a DS3 and they give a T1 to each of your customers.)
>> US West !nterprise sells such a service, only for frame relay connections.
Tom> Not quite true. We have two CT3's on order from USWest (not !nterprize)
Tom> for plain-ol' T1 aggragation...this in the WA/OR area.
And, if you get this service over a SHNS (Self Healing Network Service)
ring that you can also get from USWest, you have extremely reliable links.
Re: Terminating many T1's David Mercer (Jul 23)