Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing?
From: root () gannett com
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 14:12:38 -0400 (EDT)

On Fri, 25 Jul 1997, Eric Germann wrote:

negates the whole purpose of multihoming from their perspective.  Does
Gannett or Pointcast have >= 8K hosts exposed on their DMZ networks?

No, but we have around  8K devices using our legal address space.  Just 
because I don't currently expose my hosts doesn't mean I don't want the 
option to be able to.  When we registered, firewalls weren't the 
up-and-coming thing, but then I've also got a /23 being routed via my AS.

Most of that comes from the fact that my addresses are pre-CIDR customer 
registered ones.  Once again, it's back to the whole aggragation of 
routes vs. disaggragation of traffic.

There, now that I've used disaggragation in a sentence, I'll sit down and 
shut up.

Paul
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Robertson
gatekeeper () gannett com



  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault