Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: SMURF amplifier block list
From: Stephen Sprunk <sprunk () paranet com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 20:33:33 -0500

On the contrary; while it won't have the effect of ingress filters, it
will prevent downstreams of anyone receiving the feed from USING those
smurf sites, and it will disrupt connectivity to them in general.  If
enough people adopted the feed, it would have a reasonable effect.

Then again, filtering any packets to or from x.x.x.255 would have a
similar but more profound effect.  Anyone who actually uses a .255
address for a host is asking for trouble anyways.

Stephen


Karl Denninger wrote:

Uh, a BGP feed doesn't do you any good folks.  You want to block INGRESS,
not outbound packet flow.


-- 
Stephen Sprunk      "Oops."                 Email: sprunk () paranet com
Sprint Paranet        -Albert Einstein      ICBM:  33.00151N 96.82326W


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault