Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: SMURF amplifier block list
From: Jeff Weisberg <jaw () Op Net>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 18:05:33 -0400 (EDT)

| Then again, filtering any packets to or from x.x.x.255 would have a
| similar but more profound effect.  Anyone who actually uses a .255
| address for a host is asking for trouble anyways.

around here, we use 'em (.0 too). 'course ARIN makes me justify my 
utilization before they give me more, so I try to use addresses as 
efficiently as possible. do others not have this constraint?



Dear Mr. Arin,

  Thank you for the addresses you gave me previously. I now need
more. I have efficiently used the ones you gave me. Sort of. I
skipped over addresses ending with .0 and .255. Oh, and those 
ending in .13 too.

Thank you,

Mr. Isp Guy

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]