Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Traffic Shapping
From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil () domino org>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1998 20:14:05 +0100

On Fri, 24 Apr 1998 11:24:29 -0500 
 Jeremy Porter <jerry () freeside fc net> wrote:

FWIW, the Ascend GRF-400 traffic shapes very well.  


Sure we do it all the time.  There are CPU limitations on the
amount of total traffic that can be pushed through a router that
is traffic shaping.  I'm assuming because all the shaped traffic is
process switched.  Also you will probably want to dedicate a router
to it.

Typically these are only useful near the customer connection, as
you can really only shape outbound packets.  (unless you
traffic shape at your boarders, and have a "large" network, you've
already paid for the traffic by the time you discard it.)

In message <072601bd6f12$b4f15050$3b8d2dc7 () hermosa frontier net>, "Natambu Ob
le
ton" writes:
Has anyone here successfully implement the traffic shaping option on a Cisco
router?
--
Natambu Obleton - Network Administrator - Frontier Internet Inc.
970 385 4177 - fax: 970 385 6745 - http://www.frontier.net
777 Main St. - Suite #201 - Durango - Colorado - 81301 - USA



---
Jeremy Porter, Freeside Communications, Inc.      jerry () fc net
PO BOX 80315 Austin, Tx 78708  | 512-458-9810
http://www.fc.net





--
Neil J. McRae. Alive and Kicking.     
neil () DOMINO ORG    NetBSD-1.3 released! ftp://ftp.uk.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD
  Free the daemon in your <A HREF="http://www.NetBSD.ORG/";>computer!</A>



  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault