Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: oh, for goodness' sake.
From: Stephen Sprunk <sprunk () paranet com>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1998 18:33:47 -0300

What would be the utility of doing that?  Shouldn't we first direct
effort towards making the ROOT servers that reliable?  And then there's
always the networks used to *reach* these servers, which are often of
questionable reliability, especially when a MAE is involved.

Then again, that assumes that routers need military-grade DNS
capability, which is an absurd concept to begin with.  The routers
should simply continue to operate normally (or slightly degraded) if DNS
isn't available.  Any other design is doomed to horrible race


Karl Denninger wrote:

However, the nameserver infrastructure for such a TLD needs to go *far*
beyond *any* existing TLD's nameserver infrastructure.  You're talking here
about things that need near, or even at, military-grade reliability levels
of service.

Stephen Sprunk      "Oops."                 Email: sprunk () paranet com
Sprint Paranet        -Albert Einstein      ICBM:  33.00151N 96.82326W

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]