Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Open Standards vs IOPS etc [was Re: BGP community based IP filtering]
From: Chris Layton <cll () mecca servint com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 06:07:27 -0500 (EST)


On Thu, 15 Jan 1998, Dorian R. Kim wrote:

But isn't what you described implementation details? I'm not sure if I
see a standard to track in this... Perhaps a better venue to track 
something like this is an IEPG/RIPE/IOPS/etc.

Since you suggest IOPS as a body to track this issue, what do people think
about IOPS as a pseudo-standards group. This also came up at the December
IETF when Curtis suggested that draft-berkowitz-multirqmt document would
not be necessary since IOPS had a draft on the same subject. The IDR WG
seemed very sceptical of having a small closed body fill that role. How do
people see IOPS meshing with NANOG and the operational side of IETF?

thanks,
-chris




  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]