mailing list archives
Re: Reporting Little Blue Men
From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () scfn thpl lib fl us>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 14:39:13 -0500
On Wed, Jan 21, 1998 at 01:49:45PM -0500, Dean Anderson wrote:
But when you take the step from advocacy to actions you are violating the
law in almost every case. You can advocate anything, but you can't go
tearing down buildings, or in this case, intercepting communications.
Even if anti-spam laws are passed, you won't be able to monitor packets or
users to detect violations of the law, any more than the phone company can
listen in on your calls to make sure you aren't placing illegal bets.
Ok, but some case I just saw mentioned somewhere drew a line between
people looking at things, and programs processing them automatically,
placing the former in the category of editorial control, but not the
latter. Don't remember the context, think it was Usenet. Presumably,
if that legal theory held, it could be applied to spaminators, as well.
Jay R. Ashworth jra () baylink com
Member of the Technical Staff Unsolicited Commercial Emailers Sued
The Suncoast Freenet "Two words: Darth Doogie." -- Jason Colby,
Tampa Bay, Florida on alt.fan.heinlein +1 813 790 7592
Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Dave Stoddard (Jan 21)
Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Henry Linneweh (Jan 22)
Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Steve Sobol (Jan 23)
Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Craig A. Huegen (Jan 21)