Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: [nanog] Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access
From: Stephen Balbach <stephen () clark net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 10:59:31 -0500 (EST)

On Fri, 23 Jan 1998, Deepak Jain wrote:

UUNET doesn't own dedicated single-circuit copper to people's houses.

Okay, now lets talk about a wide-scale xDSL implementation using a 
reasonably well known POP architecture like UUNet's. 

If xDSL can only run about 18kft end-to-end, to service a wide metro area 
like Washington, D.C. one would either have to have a POP within every 6 
mile radius (fed by conventional circuits) or backhaul the data (by 
conventional circuit) to their POP.

Is this correct, if not, what am I missing?

We are part of the Bell Atlantic ADSL trial in Northern VA - basically BA
has 6 CO's with terminating ADSL modems. This is aggregated onto a FDDI
ring between each CO on cisco's. One of the CO's has a port into the BA
SMDS cloud which is the interconnect with participating ISP's who also
have a port on the SMDS cloud. So basically, packetize the data as early
as possible to get the 20x plus economies of scale vs hauling channelized


VP Technology
Verio www.verio.net/vsite/eastern.html

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]