Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access
From: Henry Linneweh <linneweh () concentric net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 10:44:18 -0800

I agree with this line of thinking, by looking at the predatory historical
behavior of MicroSoft to this date. I think if you would now talk to
Rockwell and USR to beta test their xDSL equipment this can be
derailed and since the links are already their from you to the telco's
this can be done in a short period of time, then the current projection
from the other (3) the infrastruction here is in place and polices and
all are in place with some additional changes, here rules now and
the ball should get rolling.....who controls the market first sets the

Henry R. Linneweh

Geoff White wrote:

On 23 Jan 1998, John R. Levine wrote:

Today there was an article in the sci-tech section of cnn.com mentioning
that Microsoft was teaming up with Intel and Compaq to offer xDSL service
to the homes for a very low price.  They claim to be able to provide
Internet access "30 times faster" than regular modems.

The announcement also said that four of the five baby Bells (all but
BA) are also in on the deal so they'll all use common xDSL standards,
something that's been a problem in the past.

But the important thing they did not say (and which may be of some
interest to NANOG) was what is supposed to happen to the packets once
they whiz down the DSL wire from the consumer to the phone company
central office, since DSL data, unlike ISDN or regular dialup
connections, doesn't go through the phone switch.  Whoever handles
that IP traffic needs a router or something similar next to the phone
switch to connect to those DSL pairs.  Do the Bells plan to hand all
the traffic to their oh-so-independent ISP subsidiaries?  Will it be
gold rush time as every ISP in the country scrambles to get colo space

My X-files conspiracy idea of the week on this is that they don't care
about the oh-so independent ISPs because they (Microsoft/RBOCs) will
construct their own backbone to haul this traffic and force everyone else
to peer with them ON THEIR TERMS! It's the microsoft way to try and set
the standard by force of numbers, they utterly failed at this tactict when
dealing with the internet, they failed at trying to get users to opt for
MSN over the (IETF style) Internet, this is just another attempt at an end
run around people like us. The RBOCs have the last mile, UUNET has the
Internet technology, Compaq has the sales channels into business (the
initial beachhead) Intel will make the xDSl chipset so they get economy of
scale.  The question is who will pay to build the backend infrastructure?
All they gotta do is connect to the NAPs and then start building a NAP
structure of their own, set to their own standards and protocols, this is
a good way to blindside Internet-II and IPv6 deployment.

Opps, I gotta go, the;re are some black helicopters hovering outside my
house :)



  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]