mailing list archives
Re: route ingress
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () pluris com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 1998 13:23:47 -0800
Sean M. Doran wrote:
Vadim Antonov ?avg () pluris com? writes:
? The only real solution is strong cryptographical authentication of
? the ownership of routing prefixes. For some reason i do not see
? any serious work in that direction being done.
This would be much easier if we had a bottom-up
hierarchical addressing structure rather than the
current top-down one.
I quite agree with that (though i'm not convinced that "bottom->top"
allocation combined with recursive NATting is the best architecture).
However, this does not preclude doing authentication with the current