Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering
From: Danny McPherson <danny () tcb net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 13:50:16 -0600

As has been observed many times on NANOG, one of the advantages that a
circuit-switched network like the PSTN has over a packet-switched network
like the Internet is that the PSTN has leisurely call setup times and
relatively infrequent routing table lookups.  No long-distance carrier
processes even 100 million phone calls in a day networkwide; yet there
are many routers which process billions of packets daily *per interface*.

I suppose for one this depends on your definition of leisurely,
though I certainly agree with your point.  I believe the lack of
pre-populated "forwarding tables" in the PSTN is also a major 
difference, and a major factor in circuit setup time...

The comments regarding number allocation and portability were 
more so related to the attributes of PSTN datatbase (E800, LIDB, 
PVN, etc..) versus forwarding capabilities.


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]