mailing list archives
Re: public key service
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () research att com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 17:41:54 -0400
In message <20000626172646.A1166 () eiv com>, Shawn McMahon writes:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 01:39:49PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
so, thanks to many nanogians, i now have a selection of servers, multi-
addressed servers, an ldap server, ... i can try when i need this service.
needless to say, i am not impressed. while i guess i can limp along like
this, it does not feel like what i would call a production quality service.
Randy, no offense, but it sounds like you have some seriously unrealistic
Exactly how much are you paying for this service? It sounds like you should
receive a full refund.
No, Randy has a need -- an operational need that I suspect many on this
list share. His note simply says that the current system is inadequate
for production use; a more recent note asks, in about these words,
"what can he (and other operators) do" to help the situation.