Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Stop Wcom and SPRINT from merging... customer service nightmare... (Snyder article)
From: Ehud Gavron <GAVRON () ACES COM>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 07:42:01 -0700 (MST)

http://www.nwfusion.com/columnists/2000/0626snyder.html :
MCIWorldCom should finish what's already on its plateBy Bottom Line . Joel Snyder

Network World, 06/26/00MCIWorldCom is continuing to push hard for its merger with Sprint, now offering to dispose of 
one of the Internet's unappreciated jewels, Sprint's Internet business. All this is in the name of competition, since 
WorldCom would presumably control more or less all the packets, phone calls and fiber optics in the world if no one was 

I have one request to make of the regulators in Brussels and Washington: Please, please, please, don't let WorldCom and 
Sprint merge. My plea has nothing to do with competition; it has everything to do with customer service. In his 
insatiable quest to beat Bill Gates and Larry Ellison to become the richest technodude in North America, WorldCom CEO 
Bernie Ebbers has forgotten those poor people who actually made him rich -the customers. 

Since the megamonolithic-monstrosity of WorldCom was created, service has gone to hell. Nothing can be done in real 
time; nobody is empowered to solve problems. Oh, and prices have gone up. Way up. 

All WorldCom has brought to the table is an enormous cadre of obsequious customer service reps ("I'm terribly sorry you 
had to hold, sir"), manning the phones 24 hours a day, who don't seem to be able to do anything. 

As a customer of the new, improved, WorldCom, my company hasn't seen the benefits of consolidation. One bill for all 
services? That would be OK if the bill were correct. But when WorldCom acquired Brooks Fiber in 1998, errors were made 
in moving the billing data from one system to another. We've been complaining about it for 20 months, and WorldCom 
still hasn't figured it out. 

One contact for sales? Sounds great, but the benefits escape us. Line installs and deinstalls now have to move through 
the WorldCom bureaucracy, and a six-month delay to do anything is average. 

One company for all your needs? That would be wonderful if it were really one company. In March we ordered a circuit 
from UUNET, WorldCom's Internet service provider division, and had every expectation that it would be installed within 
30 days. The official UUNET service-level agreement (SLA) is 40 business days. We're still waiting for that line to be 
installed - they blew the SLA a long time ago. Meanwhile, the UUNET techs are trying to figure out a way to make the 
combined fiber networks of UUNET, MCI, MFS and WorldCom stretch from Tucson to Phoenix. 

Sprint customers, beware! Inside WorldCom there are pockets of excellence, people who know their stuff and make the 
network run. But the bureaucratic monstrosity smothering them makes WorldCom a darn hard company to do business with. 

Will things get better? Perhaps. WorldCom certainly can't continue to do business this way. As long-term contracts 
begin to end, customers will search for other suppliers. The end result, today, is that WorldCom hasn't been able to 
completely merge the companies it already has. And now it's hungry for more? Someone should tell Bernie Ebbers he can't 
have dessert until he finishes his peas. 

Snyder, a Network World Test Alliance partner, is a senior partner at Opus One in Tucson, Ariz. He can be reached at 
Joel.Snyder () opus1 com 

Copyright 2000 Network World, Inc. All rights reserved

Sent by: Joel Snyder - mailto:jms () opus1 com 

This message was sent from 
http://www.nwfusion.com/columnists/2000/0626snyder.html  on 
Network World Fusion

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
  • Stop Wcom and SPRINT from merging... customer service nightmare... (Snyder article) Ehud Gavron (Jun 27)
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]