Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Global Crossing Network Problem.
From: Mohamed Hirse <madlion () justin net>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 09:13:13 -0400 (EDT)


I agree this is an option. How would you control the traffic flow if one
link goes down?

The APS configuration on the router relies on communication between
the router and the ADM. with in the configuration of the router you
would label and assign groups to the interface configuration. This would
tell the router/interface to respond accordingly when the circuit
switches from working to protect. This occurs automatically (most of the
most of the time) 

Are you proposing using some sort of routing mechanism to shift the
traffic or will there be intelligence build in to the ADM that would allow
the router to switch automatically?


Cheers,
Mohamed


 


On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Jesper Skriver wrote:

On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 05:35:32PM -0400, Mohamed Hirse wrote:
I only said SONET because it's layer one. If you can reroute
traffic to other circuits that are terminated on other routers that
have APS enabled you can offset any or almost any fiber cut. Unless both
Working and Protect get taken out by some strange reason.  What do you
propose?

Having 2 non-protected diverse routed circuits, both live carrying traffic, 
but not more than one can carry all the traffic when the other fail ...

/Jesper

-- 
Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk  -  CCIE #5456
Work:    Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks)
Private: Geek            @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-)

One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them,
One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.





  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault