Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: netscan.org update
From: Mark Milhollan - Franklin Employee <mlm () ftel net>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 20:20:24 -0700


John Fraizer writes:
If someone doesn't want
people sending ICMP echo-request to their network, they need to block it
at the borders.  If they do that, even if they have amp nets inside, they
won't be available for abuse from the outside.

Only from ICMP echo-request based DDoS', others will still be available. 
They'd have to block all traffic to their broadcast addresses, which is
pretty much what ``no directed broadcast'' does anyway.


In any case, I find scanning for SMURF amps and scanning for
vulnerabilities to be quite different.

Can't say I agree, since in fact they are both "vulnerabilities".


This is already too damn close to the usual thread about the other
active scan for my comfort.


/mark



  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
  • Re: netscan.org update Mark Milhollan - Franklin Employee (Oct 14)
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault