mailing list archives
Re: decreased caching efficiency?
From: Christian Kuhtz <ck () arch bellsouth net>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 14:33:38 -0400
This discussion is so unbelievably out of control.. ;) At least we're still
true to the good old NANOG tradition of scope creep.
Why are we discussing manipulating content instead of just transport caching?
Can we please stop this non-sense? Including the myriads of pseudo copyright
lawyers on this list, and the large number of falsehoods they portray as
facts... GO AWAY.
A properly working cache should not ever deliver the page differently to the
recipient than the originator intended.
If it does, it's by definition not a cache. Cache's do not alter, they just..
well,.. cache. Everything else is not caching.
Christian Kuhtz Architecture, BellSouth.net
<ck () arch bellsouth net> -wk, <ck () gnu org> -hm Atlanta, GA
"Speaking for myself only."