mailing list archives
Re: whois breakage
From: Joshua Goodall <joshua () roughtrade net>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 19:04:11 +0200 (CEST)
I would contend that it *is* broken, because it doesn't DWIM (I can see
people pouting already), and that there should be an implied $ on the end
of any search-string, since dns become more specific to the left.
I don't see an argument in favour of free-form searches in this database.
Spoof entries like these, however, are an argument against them.
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Timothy Hunt wrote:
That's not broken. One is a host record for a terrorists.net host.
And it's NOT "enough said".
The response also says:
To single out one record, look it up with "xxx", where xxx is one of the
of the records displayed above. If the records are the same, look them up
with "=xxx" to receive a full display for each record.
So, if you do whois -h whois.internic.net =microsoft.com
you get the respose you expected.
$ whois -h whois.internic.net microsoft.com
Whois Server Version 1.3
Domain names in the .com, .net, and .org domains can now be registered
with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net
for detailed information.
Enough said. Similar for apple.com. The web-based whois client at
nsiregistry.com is giving correct results, as are the gtld-servers, as
does -h networksolutions.com
FreeBSD and at least one release of Linux I've tested query
whois.internic.net by default. If anyone is using automated whois in
production (very likely), check your results!