Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

RE: InterNAP?
From: "Spolidoro, Guilherme" <guilherme.spolidoro () unisys com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 08:53:03 -0500


Since they don't own the backbone, their SLAs apply only to their PNAPs,
i.e. they cannot guarantee performance, packet loss, delay, outages, etc
over somebody else's backbone (e.g. Sprint, UUNet, AT&T, etc).

Many large enterprises are leveraging on the Internet to deploy VPN
connectivity between company sites as a replacement for Frame Relay or ATM
PVCs. In such cases, it's very important to make sure that the service comes
with the right SLAs.


-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Schmidt [mailto:tsch52 () hotmail com]
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 5:42 PM
To: nanog () merit edu
Subject: InterNAP?



I need your opinion on InterNAP.  I am currently have a DS3 to my current 
provider and want to add an additional DS3 for redundancy to the same 
location.  We plan to run BGP4 on both connections.

InterNap has some technology to avoid congested peering points. Does this 
technology actually work?  Isn't it impossible to avoid these peering 
points?  What are your experiences with InterNAP?

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.




  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault