Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: ATM Question
From: "Thomas P. Brisco" <brisco () globix net>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:14:08 -0400 (EDT)



        One of our guys just cleared out the CEF table on
the effected interface - now pings go through just fine ...
As noted earlier, mere changes in packet options were enough to
cause different behavior [I'm trying to find a Bug-ID associated
with this ....]

                                                        - Tom

On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Jeff Bartig wrote:

Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 11:27:03 -0500
From: Jeff Bartig <jeffb () doit wisc edu>
To: Richard Inhand <chapinhand () yahoo com>, nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: ATM Question



On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 04:50:10AM -0700, Richard Inhand wrote:
I'm currently looking into a weird problem at an ATM
peering point on the West Coast, when I ping from my
peer router to any of my peers I get some but not
total packet loss, when I ping from one router back or
use the loopback interface as source things are fine.
Whereas, with all my other ATM peering point routers,
for example at MAE-EAST I can ping my peers cleanly
from the same router. This isn't (to my knowledge)
affecting traffic just wondering why this strange
phenomenon should occur only in the one place.

Have you verified the return path of the packets from your peers?
Are they getting to you via that peering connection or taking a
different path back to you?




  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]