Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

RE: Mitch tries to defend his open relay again (was Re: ORBS (Re: Scanning))
From: "Vivien M." <vivienm () dyndns org>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 08:48:29 -0400

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of
Mitch Halmu
Sent: May 29, 2001 3:58 AM
To: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Cc: Stephen J. Wilcox; nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: Mitch tries to defend his open relay again (was Re: ORBS
(Re: Scanning))

There is one lesson to learn from this. We have reached a stage where
the rights of an individual or entity to existence in cyberspace need to
be protected under the law. You may take the lead in applying democratic
principles that follow the real world laws, or the legislature will do
it ad hoc.

So, if Uncle Sam comes along and decides that open relays are illegal, would
you _finally_ reconfigure your mail server?

As I'm sure you're aware, there are two sides to government intervention in
anything, and until the government intervenes, you don't know if it will be
favourable or not to your attitude. If it isn't, then should we expect
www.dotgovon.com criticizing the government for siding with the "evil Vixie

Vivien M.
vivienm () dyndns org
Assistant System Administrator
Dynamic DNS Network Services

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]