Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!?
From: John Payne <john () sackheads org>
Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 20:21:03 -0700


On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 07:31:25PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote:


Who gets hurt more if a hole is created due to de-peering?

you do.  c&w loses .00001 of the net.  you lose .02.  next question.

randy

      Not so fast. While each of his customers is more inconvenienced than each
c&w customer, c&w has more customers. The net inconvenience (total number of
people inconvenienced multiplied by the average inconvenience to each) might
be nearly the same on both sides. As an added bonus, he has someone else to
blame.

That depends.  Somebody that small (0.0001) is not going to be transit
free... so there isn't really a hole created.  Sure, the smaller guy is 
going to be paying more on transit rather than peering, but C&W customers
probably won't notice a thing, other than some relief on the congested
pipes to the public peering points.

-- 
John Payne      http://www.sackheads.org/jpayne/    john () sackheads org
http://www.sackheads.org/uce/                    Fax: +44 870 0547954
        To send me mail, use the address in the From: header


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]