Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

RE: QOS or more bandwidth
From: Eric Whitehill <eric () botbay net>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 13:42:50 -0400 (EDT)


I know of someone who is trying to do a VOIP system over a wireless
network - they are having limited success, but when they did some packet
switching magic, it seemed to help some, but last I checked they are still
having issues with it dropping calls and the phone system constantly
resetting.  Is VOIP really ready for such practices as to allow business
to totally rely on VOIP in this matter?

ok ok a little off topic ;-)

-Eric


 On Tue, 29 May 2001, Bill Woodcock wrote:

Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 10:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () zocalo net>
To: RJ Atkinson <rja () inet org>
Cc: nanog () merit edu
Subject: RE: QOS or more bandwidth


    >         Whenever I did the cost of deploying and managing fancy QoS
    > and compared it with the cost of getting and managing more capacity,
    > it was always MUCH MUCH cheaper to get and manage more capacity
    > than to mess with more QoS.

We did one VoIP network deployment, and I tried each of the different QoS
services in IOS at that time (about 18 months ago) both in the lab and in
the field, and more bandwidth was the answer then.

                                -Bill





  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]