Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: experience with BGP on Extreme's Alpine
From: "Robert A. Hayden" <rhayden () geek net>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 18:33:08 -0500 (CDT)


My experiences with Extreme equipment at both L2 and L3 has been extremely
pleasing.  We done Black Diamonds talking BGP to Junipers and found no
problems save for lack of ATM legacy support on the Extreme gear (I'd love
to cleanly map PVCs into an 802.1q VLAN).  We've not done BGP from the
Alpines, as we use them primarily for 10/100 to Gig aggregation to BDs at
the core, but its the same software on both platforms so I don't imagine
any problems would crop up specific to the Alpines.

As for the load balancing aspect, we've been less giddy.  It's functional,
especially if you are balancing basic HTML/SSL type traffic, but tends to
break down when you try to get more creative (such as DNS caching servers,
for example).  If your client needs basic TCP load balancing for http,
smtp, etc (which will suffice for many people), you should still get
excellent results from the 380x line.

On Thu, 31 May 2001, Arnold Nipper wrote:


I know ExtremeNetwork's high position in L2, but don't have any idea how they
perform on L3. Now an Alpine3804 might the right solution for a customer as
he needs a loadbalancer, switch and router which also should do BGP.

Any experience and hints welcome!


Arnold



  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault