Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

RE: HR 1542 [OT, anti-BS attempt, US]
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 11:33:20 -0700


From: Greg Maxwell [mailto:gmaxwell () martin fl us]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 11:15 AM

On Mon, 7 May 2001, Roeland Meyer wrote:

[snip]
Cable operators are unregulated local monopolies.

No. They are regulated, by the franchise agreement. If the 
agreement isn't
strong enough to ensure the highest best use of public 
right-of-way then
it's a failure of the local government for not making it so (or the
state/FCC for forbiding the local governments from placing certain
requirements in the agreement).

The problem is that the local govs seldom "get it right" or, as mentioned
earlier, simply don't care (the latter being more prevalent). Most of this
is out of band, as far as state PUCs are concerned. Ergo, there is no
recourse or appeal. This is a major disconnect in the system process.


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]