mailing list archives
Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!?
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () mfnx net>
Date: 07 May 2001 23:19:27 -0700
peter () dataloss nl (Peter van Dijk) writes:
I do still think UUnet is in a downward spiral, just like C&W. Strong
peering policies are not good for the Internet.
Well, before I returned to PAIX, I was CTO of MFN. MFN had bought Abovenet,
and I learnt to respect strong peering policies. Abovenet's peering policy
was, and as far as I know still is, very "strong". It's strongly _open_,
which means it's different from the purported C&W policy being discussed here
this week. But while different it is still "strong".
I think what you were looking to say above is that "*closed* peering policies
are not good for the Internet." Probably noone will *publically* disagree
with such sentiments. Not on nanog, anyway.
Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Owen DeLong (May 07)
RE: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Barrows, Jeff (May 07)