mailing list archives
Re: black hat .cn networks
From: Jim Dixon <jdd () vbc net>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 08:12:29 +0100 (BST)
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Shawn McMahon wrote:
If we are going to be politically correct and insist that every NOC
in the world be capable of communicating in all of the major languages
of the world, the Internet will grind to a halt.
And if we are going to insist that they all speak English, we are going
to be insisting to deaf ears; case in point, all the complaints here about
abuse complaints being blackholed.
The very practical hard reality is that those running the Internet
communicate in English. The reason for this is very simple: cost.
In Europe, adding simultaneous translation into the major EU
languages can easily double the cost of holding a conference.
This sort of compromise is universal. There are many languages
within China, for example, but people compromise by using one of
them for universal communications, the language commonly called
Nobody is insisting that the world's NOCs communicate in English.
They just do, because it's practical. In most countries, there is
a very high probability that anyone with a technical education has
had several years of English in school. This is certainly the case
in Japan, China, Russia, India, Pakistan, most of Southeast Asia,
and the countries of northern Europe.
It may be that in ten years or so machine translation will be
accurate enough and cheap enough to allow the sort of thing that
you propose. However, I suspect that most people will use this
high quality machine translation to improve the quality of their
translations to and from English. Once again, it's simple economics:
if there are N languages, the cost of writing translators to and
from English is going to be proportional to N, but the cost of
writing a full set of translators between all N languages is going
to be proportional to N squared, a huge number.
Attempting to build a universal tool for translating problem reports
into all the languages of the world is a utopian project that is not
going to succeed. A more realistic goal would be trying to get
English-speaking engineers to write problem reports in good, clear
English. I don't think that that is going to happen, and it's far
easier to achieve than what you are proposing.
Jim Dixon VBCnet GB Ltd http://www.vbc.net
tel +44 117 929 1316 fax +44 117 927 2015
- Re: black hat .cn networks, (continued)