Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: terminal server recommendation
From: "just me." <matt () camel ethereal net>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 14:56:50 -0700 (PDT)

I've been completely happy with our installation of PM25's. They are
getting harder to find/more expensive, though. Lucent really blew it
EOL'ing these.

We have ~100 in production and aside from an occasonal DOA they've
been frawless. BBNPlanet also used them exclusively for console access
when I was there.


On Tue, 1 May 2001, Aaron Dewell wrote:

  If you can find them, Livingston/Lucent PM-25s work pretty well too and are
  cheap (since they are discontinued).
  On Tue, 1 May 2001, Charles Smith wrote:
  > I would like to deploy a terminal server in several of my POPs, however cost
  > is a slight issue. Can anyone on the list recommend a fairly inexpensive
  > terminal server (besides Cisco)? Obviously the terminal server should be
  > reliable and work - it is the little things that count.
  > chas

--mghali () snark net------------------------------------------<darwin><
   Flowers on the razor wire/I know you're here/We are few/And far
   between/I was thinking about her skin/Love is a many splintered
   thing/Don't be afraid now/Just walk on in. #include <disclaim.h>

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]