mailing list archives
Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS
From: Pyda Srisuresh <srisuresh () yahoo com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 09:02:34 -0700 (PDT)
--- Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2001 23:18:09 PDT, Adam McKenna <adam () flounder net> said:
It does hurt. It causes non-obvious problems. Forcing hostnames and PTR's
to match (commonly referred to as PARANOID checking) does not provide extra
security, it just prevents people with badly configured DNS from accessing
I once did a similar check in a Sendmail configuration, and found it to be
incredibly useful in reducing the spam load without significantly impacting
There's a second-order effect here - the sort of clueless ISP that is unable
to get a PTR entry correct is *ALSO* the sort of clueless ISP that is very
likely unable to detect/eliminate hacker/spammer/etc nests in their address
You of course need to be sure that your *own* DNS is rock-solid and up to
date (although our departmental network liaisons that maintain their zones
have learned that Things Will Not Work if they don't do it right ;). You
also need to apply the usual skepticism for results - there *could* be a
temporary outage, for instance.
Forcing hostnames and PTR's to match will also prevent people from NAT
land accessing your servers. There are hardly any NAT implementations
that do dynamic DNS updates.
It's *NOT* a security measure to deploy by itself. It's however useful as
Yet Another Part of a Complete and Balanced Security Breakfast... ;)
Only if you consider keeping up-to-date PTR records and dynamic DNS updates
a security measure.
Operating Systems Analyst
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS Roeland Meyer (May 14)