Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

RE: rfc 3091,3092,3098
From: "Mark Radabaugh - Amplex" <mark () amplex net>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 21:56:20 -0400

Yes.  but the html post is not.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of
Micah McNelly
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 9:53 PM
To: nanog () merit edu
Subject: rfc 3091,3092,3098

I am very unclear about the nature of the following rfcs:

3091 Pi Digit Generation Protocol
3098 How to Advertise Responsibly etc etc.
3092 Etymology of "Foo"

Is this some kind of joke?  I am seriously confused.


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]