mailing list archives
Re: rfc 3091,3092,3098
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon () eiv com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 21:59:26 -0400
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 06:52:39PM -0700, Micah McNelly wrote:
I am very unclear about the nature of the following rfcs:
3091 Pi Digit Generation Protocol
3098 How to Advertise Responsibly etc etc.
3092 Etymology of "Foo"
Is this some kind of joke? I am seriously confused.
Sounds to me like you're not confused at all.
I like 2100, myself. 1149 is a classic, as well, and has the interesting
advantage that it's actually been implemented in the field.
See http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ for details.