Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: A question on CE to PE route exchanges ...
From: Dave Israel <davei () biohazard demon digex net>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 13:49:30 -0400

On 5/21/2001 at 14:18:15 -0700, Robert Raszuk said:

not be interested.  The issue here is that Cisco will tend to
add IGP routes to the default table, not the VPN table.  Bad
things ensue.

What ... ? For protocols that have been vrf aware routes go into vrfs
and not global RIB. 

That's the problem:  not all the IGP's (specifically, not ours) are
aware, and handling for a non-aware IGP on a VRF interface is 
more dangerous than one might expect.


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]