mailing list archives
Re: A question on CE to PE route exchanges ...
From: Dave Israel <davei () biohazard demon digex net>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 13:49:30 -0400
On 5/21/2001 at 14:18:15 -0700, Robert Raszuk said:
not be interested. The issue here is that Cisco will tend to
add IGP routes to the default table, not the VPN table. Bad
What ... ? For protocols that have been vrf aware routes go into vrfs
and not global RIB.
That's the problem: not all the IGP's (specifically, not ours) are
aware, and handling for a non-aware IGP on a VRF interface is
more dangerous than one might expect.