mailing list archives
RE: EMAIL != FTP
From: "Robert Blayzor" <rblayzor () thebiz net>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 11:20:28 -0400
It is worth remembering that SMTP is, in most respects, simply
In many ways, HTTP is FTP badly reinvented.
But for a little extra SMTP handshaking at the start, there is no
difference in transfer rate between SMTP and FTP. Probably the same is
true for HTTP though I've not looked.
I think you missed the fact that sending files via SMTP is incredibly
inefficient. Any files sent via SMTP have to be encoded which can balloon
the transmission up 30%+. That is an incredible waste of bandwidth on a
10MB file. Also, remember that SMTP usually relays, so the message is
bounced between 1-8 servers along the way (or more), more bandwidth and
resources wasted. *sigh*
Robert Blayzor IP Network Engineer, BOFH BiznessOnline.com, Inc.
rblayzor () thebiz net noc () thebiz net http://www.thebiz.net/
FreeBSD, Putting the 'Operating' back into OS! -- http://www.freebsd.org/
RE: Stealth Blocking Roeland Meyer (May 25)