Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

RE: Stealth Blocking
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 09:05:53 -0700

The original message never made that distinction.

-----Original Message-----
From: Shawn McMahon [mailto:smcmahon () eiv com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 4:30 AM
To: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: Stealth Blocking

On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 08:04:34PM -0400, Jason Slagle wrote:

And, as a business we wouldn't divert you.  This is only a 
solution for
Resi accounts.

You do realize, I assume, that if somebody thinks he's sending email
directly to a certain server, and you divert it to another server,
you're intercepting it under the terms of the Electronic 
Privacy Act of 1986?

That's allowed if it's necessary to provide the service, but good luck
winning on that argument with the plaintiffs trotting out 
witnesses stating
it's not necessary, just your choice.

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]