Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Possible solution? (e-mail parcel vs. FTP)
From: Matt Martini <martini () invision net>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 11:51:39 -0400 (EST)


On Fri, 25 May 2001, E.B. Dreger wrote:

Methinks that it's proxy time.  Why not hack the popular MTAs so that they
take attachments, spool them in a Web-accessible directory, then modify
the message.

Just like e-cards...

      ATTACHMENTS:

      1. http://some.domain.tld/path/to/sample/file.jpg
      2. http://another.place.tld/second-attachment.doc

Go to the link, receive a warning that they must save the file after
download, that it will be deleted after successful download.  Or delete it
after a few days.  Or maybe users could manage their Web spool, deleting
messages as they please.

There are some details to work out, but is the "FTP upload" not a task
that we could automatically perform for users?


This is actually one of the more constructive comments in the (off-topic for
nanog) thread.

I don't email is the correct vehicle for large documents (size > 1M), but
getting the public to do the correct-but-more-difficult thing is a losing
battle.

If ISPs took it upon themselves to convert attachments to http/ftp
on-the-fly and transparently to users you would have a sol'n that should
work for everyone.

Authentication could easily be added via MD5 checksums (ala ezmlm) and
encription could even be added via https.

For those of us that want to change the world, it's much easier to take
action and change the system then to try and convert all the users.

Matt


__________________________ http://www.invision.net/ _______________________

 Matthew E. Martini, PE        InVision.com, Inc.   (631) 543-1000 x104
 Chief Technology Officer      matt () invision net    (631) 864-8896 Fax
_______________________________________________________________________pgp_




  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]